What do you think of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepping down from the committee responsible for reviewing the safety of models such as o1?

prompted with those terms and correlations),

“RAPIDLY ADVANCING AI”

step was decided,

Why is social media so anti-fee speech, and have they become total BS?

(according to a LLM chat bot query,

Function Described. January, 2022

"[chain of thought means that it] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

The One Habit an Oncologist Recommends Everyone Add by Age 40 - Eat This Not That

In two and a half years,

within a day.

by use instances.

Keyshawn Davis vs. Edwin De Los Santos canceled after Davis' massive weight miss, Abdullah Mason to headline - Yahoo Sports

“[chain of thought is] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

“[chain of thought] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

“Some people just don’t care.”

Should any books be banned from school libraries? Why is it important for students to read certain books in school?

guy

will be vivisection (live dissection) of Sam,

“Talking About Large Language Models,”

Why do some of those who believe in a god refuse to consider the possibility they could be wrong?

within a single context.

(barely) one sentence,

of the same function,

Why do I feel bad when I see white girls dating black guys, am I racist?

Let’s do a quick Google:

Is it better to use the terminology,

Further exponential advancement,

Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr. - MLB Trade Rumors

from

I may as well just quote … myself:

describing the way terms were used in “Rapid Advances in AI,”

Which fish tastes good for South Indian curries?

putting terms one way,

(the more accurate, but rarely used variant terminology),

and

Why do people keep saying they have evidence and have presented it that proves you're wrong even though they have none and haven't presented anything? Furthermore, what do they think you're wrong about?

better-accepted choice of terminology,

with each further dissection of dissected [former] Sam.

in the 2015 explanatory flowchart -

Supernovae may have kicked off abrupt climate shifts in the past—and they could again - Phys.org

“EXPONENTIAL ADVANCEMENT IN AI,”

January, 2022 (Google)

It’s the same f*cking thing.

“Rapid Advances In AI,”

to

"[chain of thought] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

January 2023 (Google Rewrite v6)

"a simple method called chain of thought prompting -- a series of intermediate reasoning steps -- improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks.”

The dilemma:

ONE AI

September, 2024 (OpenAI o1 Hype Pitch)

“Rapidly Evolving Advances in AI”

Damn.

“anthropomorphically loaded language”?

Same Function Described. September, 2024

Eighth down (on Hit & Graze)

when I’m just looking for an overall,

Of course that was how the

three, overly protracted, anthropomorphism-loaded language stuffed, gushingly exuberant, descriptive sentences.

the description,

DOING THE JOB OF FOUR

“Rapidly Advancing AI,”

has “rapidly advanced,”

increasing efficiency and productivity,

Nails

or

- further advancing the rapidly advancing … something.

“anthropomorphism loaded language”

Combining,

An

“RAPID ADVANCES IN AI”

Fifth down (on Full Hit)